by WiZ » Sun Jan 29, 2023 8:25 pm
Sarisberie
Relevant exact location of the crime, in the building site this, nearby? Elsewhere but evidence was hidden/planted at the building site? During building this, or after completion? Did it matter where the shorts were hidden? yes Were the shorts owned by an onlooker? A builder? Someone relevant to the crime? irrelevant/unknowable Were the shorts used to block something up, e.g. toilets, sewage, the water pipes, electricity supply? no Was there sabotage? no Revenge? no Other motive? yes Was anyone framed? no Did the building end up having to be repaired or demolished? irrel, but likely Did the builders or the owner get paid twice, to build it properly a second time? no
Trebor
On the line of there being a specifically chosen person...was this the person who committed the crime? yes The person to whom the shorts belonged? no Was the person framed? no
Was the person well-known locally? well enough, yes Were they well-known outside of this area? no, or at least less so Were they the owner of the land/building? no Were they famous for owning real estate? no For running a certain company? Or type of company? thisish For manufacturing clothing? no
Was the clothing used for insulation? Support? this
LemonCurry
Was material like the pants used in construction of the building all over? yes
Was the crime using illegal material for construction? yes
I think we're there
***** SPOILER *****
The office building had been negligently constructed, with many corners cut and standards not adhered to. After an earthquake claimed the lives of some of those working in the office at the time, an investigation was carried out into the building's structural integrity. This revealed many of the problems, including unsuitable materials and rubbish used as insulation and to cushion water infrastructure - including the infamous pair of shorts.
The construction manager was then arrested for criminal negligence.
Congratulations on the solution, and thank you everyone for playing!