[WiZ] First among First Losers

An archive of solved lateral thinking puzzles.

Moderators: Balin, kalira, peter365, JenBurdoo, Tiger

[WiZ] First among First Losers

Postby WiZ » Mon Mar 18, 2024 10:39 pm

The second-highest score ever achieved in a particular sport will likely be beaten again, but probably never equalled. Why not?

ROIMBT. Caveat Earlispoiilor. OAATP rules apply.
Last edited by WiZ on Sun Mar 24, 2024 7:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
WiZ
 
Posts: 4013
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:19 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby Sarisberie2 » Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:18 pm

Is the sport: Indoor/outdoor, land, sea, air, countryside, stadium, field, game, team sport, individual sport, not really a sport (e.g. darts, snooker)?
Was the second-highest score previously beaten?
Sarisberie2
 
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2023 5:52 pm

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby WiZ » Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:21 pm

Is the sport: Indoor usually /outdoor occasionally, land yes, sea, air, no to both countryside rarely, stadium no, field rarely, game yes, team sport, individual sport, both, often enough not really a sport (e.g. darts, snooker)? Going by your examples, I'll say yesish
Was the second-highest score previously beaten? yes
User avatar
WiZ
 
Posts: 4013
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:19 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby WiZ » Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:21 pm

It looks like we both forgot this was an OAATP, so let's forgive and move on
User avatar
WiZ
 
Posts: 4013
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:19 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby Sarisberie2 » Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:29 pm

WiZ wrote:It looks like we both forgot this was an OAATP, so let's forgive and move on


Oh, sorry!
Sarisberie2
 
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2023 5:52 pm

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby BitterLemonCurry » Tue Mar 19, 2024 12:56 pm

Is this second highest score unusually granular?
BitterLemonCurry
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2021 7:58 am
Location: Worms, Germany

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby Sundowner64 » Tue Mar 19, 2024 3:28 pm

Is there only one possible way to score better than the second best? (i.e. will the second best remain the second best for ever, even if beaten multiple times?)
Sundowner64
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2021 5:17 pm

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby WiZ » Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:53 am

BitterLemonCurry

Is this second highest score unusually granular? I will say yes, FAs lurking

Sundowner

Is there only one possible way to score better than the second best? Yes, barring a truly exceptional circumstance (i.e. will the second best remain the second best for ever, even if beaten multiple times?)
User avatar
WiZ
 
Posts: 4013
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:19 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby BitterLemonCurry » Wed Mar 20, 2024 7:52 am

Is it bowling?
BitterLemonCurry
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2021 7:58 am
Location: Worms, Germany

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby GalFisk » Wed Mar 20, 2024 10:26 am

Is the score a: tally? Time? Height? Length? Force? Weight? Count? Judgement?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 12325
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby WiZ » Wed Mar 20, 2024 8:05 pm

BitterLemonCurry

Is it bowling? It is!

GalFisk

Is the score a: tally? this Time? Height? Length? Force? Weight? Count? Judgement?
User avatar
WiZ
 
Posts: 4013
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:19 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby trebor2 » Wed Mar 20, 2024 8:36 pm

Is it because it’s more common to get a perfect game than to bowl all strikes but for your last shot (or whatever it’s called)?
trebor2
 
Posts: 526
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2021 6:59 am

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby WiZ » Wed Mar 20, 2024 9:48 pm

Is it because it’s more common to get a perfect game than to bowl all strikes but for your last shot (or whatever it’s called)? no/FA
User avatar
WiZ
 
Posts: 4013
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:19 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby BitterLemonCurry » Thu Mar 21, 2024 7:51 am

Does the second-highest score include a broken pin? A broken ball? Machinery malfunction? Another unusual occurrence?
BitterLemonCurry
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2021 7:58 am
Location: Worms, Germany

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby Sarisberie2 » Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:34 pm

Has anything been adjusted, e.g. size of bowl?
Sarisberie2
 
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2023 5:52 pm

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby WiZ » Fri Mar 22, 2024 2:28 am

BitterLemonCurry

Has anything been adjusted, e.g. size of bowl? no

BitterLemonCurry

Does the second-highest score include a broken pin? yes! A broken ball? Machinery malfunction? Another unusual occurrence?
User avatar
WiZ
 
Posts: 4013
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:19 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby BitterLemonCurry » Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:11 am

Was the game in question scored at a fraction of a point short of a perfect score, as the stump of a broken pin remained standing at the last shot?
BitterLemonCurry
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2021 7:58 am
Location: Worms, Germany

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby GalFisk » Fri Mar 22, 2024 8:48 am

Would equalling it entail breaking a pin? Breaking a pin and having the remnants stay standing?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 12325
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby Sundowner64 » Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:33 am

Was half a point deducted from the perfect score for a foul or technicalities?
Sundowner64
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2021 5:17 pm

Re: [WiZ] First among First Losers [OAATP]

Postby WiZ » Sun Mar 24, 2024 7:55 pm

Was the game in question scored at a fraction of a point short of a perfect score, as the stump of a broken pin remained standing at the last shot?

***** SPOILER *****

In 1905, James Blackstone officially bowled a 299-and-a-half game. This took place in Seattle, Washington, where he was denied a 300 game when a pin cracked in half on his last ball in the 10th frame. The bottom of the pin remained standing, while everything else fell. After some deliberation, officials decided to give him a score of 299.5.


Congratulations, BitterLemonCurry, on the solution, and thank you everyone for playing!
User avatar
WiZ
 
Posts: 4013
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:19 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand


Return to Solved Lateral Thinking Puzzles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest