by Biograd1 » Mon Oct 20, 2025 7:48 am
Did the general purpose of the change fall within the category of:
Stating that something wasn't, or was, AI-generated?
Expressing a stance/opinion about AI (or clarifying a stance, if something in the book could unintentionally be seen as expressing an opinion for or against it)?
Protecting something or someone from having work stolen by AI?
Preventing AI from being confused/misled by something in the audio that may cause it to malfunction if the audio is fed through it?
To clarify, we ARE talking about the current, "generative" AI (the kind that imitates human language, art, code, etc. and often at least claims to "understand" them)--NOT something like text-to-speech or speech-to-text (many of which now use AI/ML based technologies, but that in concept existed already well before the current AI wave).