lat-puzz.com

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:19 am

How did the vegetable help the store?

by **BeachDude** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:32 am

vegetable as in that type of food that nobody likes to eat?
store as in an establishment that sells food?
Did the store gain by selling this particular vegetable?
If so, is the store a big chain? A local grocery?
Was the vegetable unknown until the store sold it?

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:33 am

vegetable as in that type of food that nobody likes to eat? Yope.
store as in an establishment that sells food? Yes.
Did the store gain by selling this particular vegetable? No.
If so, is the store a big chain? This. A local grocery? No.
Was the vegetable unknown until the store sold it? No.

by **BeachDude** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:40 am

Did the store actually even sell the vegetable?
WAG Corn (used for corn syrup)?

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:44 am

Did the store actually even sell the vegetable? Not the one that helped them (though they sell others of the same kind).
WAG Corn (used for corn syrup)? No.

by **BeachDude** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:48 am

Were they helped because a competive store sold the vegetable in question?

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:49 am

Were they helped because a competive store sold the vegetable in question? Yes.

by **BeachDude** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:06 am

Is this an actual event IRL? If so did it happen after 2000? After 1970? after 1920?

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:10 am

Is this an actual event IRL? Yes. If so did it happen after 2000? This. After 1970? after 1920?

by **RedWine** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:21 am

Was the vegetable good to eat? Tasty? $poiled? Was it bought by anyone relevant? Was it relevantly cooked? Or eaten? Is it relevant how? when? where? by whom? was it grown?

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 1:39 pm

Was the vegetable good to eat? Yes. Tasty? Yes. $poiled? No. Was it bought by anyone relevant? Yes. Was it relevantly cooked? Yope. Or eaten? Yes.
Is it relevant how? when? where? by whom? was it grown? No to all.

by **Balin** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 3:34 pm

Was it one particular vegetable (i.e. a single carrot)? Or one type of vegetable (i.e. carrots)?
Did the store that was helped also sell the vegetable?
Was the vegetable purchased by the owners/management of the helped store? Who re-sold the vegetable for a higher price at their store?

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 4:05 pm

Was it one particular vegetable (i.e. a single carrot)? No. Or one type of vegetable (i.e. carrots)? Yes. Not carrots though.
Did the store that was helped also sell the vegetable? Yes.
Was the vegetable purchased by the owners/management of the helped store? No. Who re-sold the vegetable for a higher price at their store? No.

by **Balin** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 5:13 pm

GM crops relevant?

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 5:18 pm

GM crops relevant? No.

by **danobrazil** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 5:41 pm

Could it have just as easily been another type of vegetable? Is it a common vegetable? Common but this variety isn't?
Did consumers buy the vegetable in the hopes of gaining some benefit? Health? Weight loss? Did consumers make any FAs about the vegetable in the store in question vs the competitor store?

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 5:44 pm

Could it have just as easily been another type of vegetable? No. Is it a common vegetable? Yes. Common but this variety isn't? The variety (DOYD) is common.
Did consumers buy the vegetable in the hopes of gaining some benefit? DOYD of "benefit". Health? NO. Weight loss? NO. Did consumers make any FAs about the vegetable in the store in question vs the competitor store? No and irrelevant.

by **danobrazil** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:03 pm

Vegetable is - something grown under the soil? above the soil? Leafy? Stalky? Has seeds within? Green? Red? Yellow? Purple/Black/Blue? Brown? Orange?

Do everyday consumers relevantly eat this product? An Individual (Famous?)? A small group? Did the competitor run out of the vegetable? Have a problem with the vegetable?

Any of these relevant - Vegetarians? Gourmet? Food dish/recipe? Another not common use for the vegetable?

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:10 pm

Vegetable is - something grown under the soil? This. above the soil? Leafy? No. Stalky? No. Has seeds within? No. Green? No. Red? No (some can be). Yellow? Yesish. Purple/Black/Blue? No. Brown? Yes. Orange? No.

Do everyday consumers relevantly eat this product? Yes. An Individual (Famous?)? A small group? Both irr. Did the competitor run out of the vegetable? No. Have a problem with the vegetable? No.

Any of these relevant - Vegetarians? Assume no. Gourmet? No. Food dish Yes. /recipe? No. Another not common use for the vegetable? A common use is relevant.

by **danobrazil** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:23 pm

So it's a variety of potato? Or onion? Any relevant properties of vegetable that are viewable - like they have eyes, skin, or size, color?
If potatoes - mashed? boiled? fried? baked?
I assume the "benefit" is making? or eating? the dish
So the particular food dish - represents another country/culture? Is decidedly very tasty?
Does this occur in a Western country?

by **GalFisk** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:05 pm

So it's a variety of potato? Yes. Or onion? No. Any relevant properties of vegetable that are viewable - like they have eyes, skin, or size, color? No.
If potatoes - mashed? boiled? fried? This, and more. No to the others. baked?
I assume the "benefit" is making? No. or eating? Yes. the dish
So the particular food dish - represents another country/culture? No/irr. Is decidedly very tasty? Yes.
Does this occur in a Western country? Yes.

by **danobrazil** » Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:26 pm

Type of fried potatoes - Hash-browns? Deep fried? Sauteed? Other ingredients bound to them? Within another substance like dough?

Is the dish tasty because of the type of potato? Something done to the potatoes before being sold? Spices? Are the potatoes sold raw and in bags?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 8:56 am

Type of fried potatoes - Hash-browns? No. Deep fried? Yes. Sauteed? No. Other ingredients bound to them? Yes. Within another substance like dough? No.

Is the dish tasty because of the type of potato? No. Something done to the potatoes before being sold? Yes. Spices? Yes. Are the potatoes sold raw No. and in bags? Yes.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:02 am

Did both stores sell potatoes in form of deep-fried spiced (salted?) dish? If so, did the dishes relevantly differ? Was the dish made popular by the relevant someone who bought it?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:11 am

Did both stores sell potatoes in form of deep-fried spiced (salted?) dish? Yes. (Salt is essential, other spices common but optional). If so, did the dishes relevantly differ? No. Was the dish made popular by the relevant someone who bought it? No.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:13 am

Did either store invent the dish? Is the dish just french fries?
Did only one store profit from the dish? Did only one profit significantly more than the other? Was the store about to go bankrupt?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:18 am

Did either store invent the dish? No. Is the dish just french fries? No, but close.
Did only one store profit from the dish? No. Did only one profit significantly more than the other? No. Was the store about to go bankrupt? No.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:36 am

Did any of the relevant stores sell anything else relevant? Maybe something that was not selling well and now it can be sold together with potato dish, what increases the demand for that other product?
Chips/crisps relevant?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:40 am

Did any of the relevant stores sell anything else relevant? They sell lots of things, but what they sell is not that relevant. Maybe something that was not selling well and now it can be sold together with potato dish, what increases the demand for that other product? No, nothing like this.
Chips/crisps relevant? Yes indeed. Potato chips.
The potato chips sold by one store helped another store.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:43 am

Do the stores get relevantly confused? Were potato chips relevantly advertised? Did the relevant buyer bought them from helping store? Helped store? Relevant? Should that person relevantly refrain from potato chips? Is the chips producer relevant? Is the brand relevant?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:44 am

Do the stores get relevantly confused? No. Were potato chips relevantly advertised? No. Did the relevant buyer bought them from helping store? Yes. Helped store? No. Relevant? No. Should that person relevantly refrain from potato chips? Yes. Is the chips producer relevant? No. Is the brand relevant? No.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:48 am

Is that person commonly associated with healthy lifestyle? Or losing weight? Does that person publicly advertise something relevant?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:51 am

Is that person commonly associated with healthy lifestyle? No. Or losing weight? No. Does that person publicly advertise something relevant? No.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:54 am

Was the person spotted buying chips? Did it increase the sell of the chips in general (thus also in both stores)?
Was the person a celebrity? Was that person somehow related to chips industry? Or to either of the stores?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:56 am

Was the person spotted buying chips? Irrelevant. Did it increase the sell of the chips in general (thus also in both stores)? No.
Was the person a celebrity? No. Was that person somehow related to chips industry? No. Or to either of the stores? Indirectly.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:59 am

Is it relevant what quantity of chips was bought by this person? Just a pack?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 12:00 pm

Is it relevant what quantity of chips was bought by this person? No. Just a pack? Assume this.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 12:30 pm

Was the person indirectly connected with helping store? Helped store? Did they knew that they would help the helped store by buying a pack of chips? If yes, was it the purpose of the person?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 1:10 pm

Was the person indirectly connected with helping store? No. Helped store? Yes. Did they knew that they would help the helped store by buying a pack of chips? No. If yes, was it the purpose of the person? No.

by **danobrazil** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:01 pm

Was the person who indirectly helped the "helped store" a - Chef, food critic, another food profession, TV/movie celebrity, singer, politician, royalty?
Was the other store open to the public? Or more of a distributor/warehouse?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:17 pm

Was the person who indirectly helped the "helped store" a - Chef, food critic, another food profession, TV/movie celebrity, singer, politician, royalty? No to all.
Was the other store open to the public? Yes. Or more of a distributor/warehouse? No.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 3:36 pm

Is it relevant why the person should avoid chips? Maybe it was a particularly bad store employee, allergic to chips, who once went to the other store, bought some and ate them istantly, got ill, had to take some time off work and sales of the store immediately improved?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 3:49 pm

Is it relevant why the person should avoid chips? Yes. Maybe it was a particularly bad store employee, allergic to chips, who once went to the other store, bought some and ate them istantly, got ill, had to take some time off work and sales of the store immediately improved? Good guess, but incorrect. There are some useful ideas in there tough.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 3:58 pm

Were chips more dangerous for that person's health than they usually are? Was that person suffering from a relevant medical condition? Diabetes perhaps?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:00 pm

Were chips more dangerous for that person's health than they usually are? Slightly. Was that person suffering from a relevant medical condition? Yesish. Diabetes perhaps? No.

by **RedWine** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:04 pm

Was that person allergic to something relevant? Was that person handicapped? Did that person have to control the amount of salt eaten? If that person had eaten a pack of salted peanuts, would it have helped the store?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:17 pm

Was that person allergic to something relevant? Possibly. Eating the chips does cause something unpleasant.. Was that person handicapped? No. Did that person have to control the amount of salt eaten? No. If that person had eaten a pack of salted peanuts, would it have helped the store? I don't believe it would.

by **danobrazil** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 8:07 pm

Relevant medical condition - Obesity? High Cholesterol? Gluten related (from oils)?
Any of these relevant - Olestra (fat substitute), profession of man who bought the chips, health foods?
Did the person who bought the bag of chips do anything aside from eat the chips? If so, an experiment?
Did that person buy the chips to help the store which was helped?

by **GalFisk** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 8:29 pm

Relevant medical condition - Obesity? No. High Cholesterol? No. Gluten related (from oils)? No.
Any of these relevant - Olestra (fat substitute), No. profession of man who bought the chips, No. health foods? No.
Did the person who bought the bag of chips do anything aside from eat the chips? Yes. If so, an experiment? No.
Did that person buy the chips to help the store which was helped? No.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 9:45 am

Did that person do anything relevant with the empty chips bag? Did that person bring the chips to the helped store? Did they share chips with someone else relevant? Was there a relevant bonus item in the bag of chips?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 9:54 am

Did that person do anything relevant with the empty chips bag? No. Did that person bring the chips to the helped store? No. Did they share chips with someone else relevant? Yes. Was there a relevant bonus item in the bag of chips? No.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 9:57 am

Did they share chips with a person? With an animal?
The other person: is age relevant? Is profession relevant? Is that person linked to any of the relevant stores?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 9:59 am

Did they share chips with a person? Yes. With an animal? No.
The other person: is age relevant? Noish. Is profession relevant? Yes. Is that person linked to any of the relevant stores? Yes.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:02 am

Is the other person the owner of either of the stores? If yes: helped? helping?
Is the other person the employee of either of the stores? If yes: helped? helping?
Does the other person relevantly advertise either of the stores? If yes: helped? helping?
Were two relevant people related?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:15 am

Is the other person the owner of either of the stores? No. If yes: helped? helping?
Is the other person the employee of either of the stores? Assume yes. If yes: helped? This. helping?
Does the other person relevantly advertise either of the stores? No. If yes: helped? helping?
Were two relevant people related? Not by blood, but...

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:19 am

Were two relevant people close friends? Engaged? Life partners? Is it relevant why an employee could not have bought (or hadn't wanted to buy) chips in the helped store?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:21 am

Were two relevant people close friends? Yes. Engaged? No, but that would work. Life partners? Yes. Is it relevant why an employee could not have bought (or hadn't wanted to buy) chips in the helped store? No.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:31 am

Did the employee ask the buyer to go to competing store and buy a pack of chips for them to eat? Did the buyer go there on his own account and just shared chips with the employee? Relevant?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:32 am

Did the employee ask the buyer to go to competing store and buy a pack of chips for them to eat? Yes. Did the buyer go there on his own account and just shared chips with the employee? No. Relevant? No.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:37 am

Did eating the chips cause unpleasant health issue to the employee? To the buyer?
After the situation, would employee and buyer buy chips in the helped store next time?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:49 am

Did eating the chips cause unpleasant health issue to the employee? No. To the buyer? Yes.
After the situation, would employee and buyer buy chips in the helped store next time? Irrelevant.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:01 am

Unpleasant health issue: Diarrhea? Vomiting? Bad breath? Losing consciousness? High blood pressure? High body temperature?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:10 am

Unpleasant health issue: Diarrhea? Vomiting? Bad breath? Losing consciousness? High blood pressure? High body temperature? No to all.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:14 am

Is it painful for the buyer? If so, is the pain on particular body part? Particular internal organ? Did that person need to be taken to hospital? Was it life-threatening condition?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:38 am

Is it painful for the buyer? Yes. If so, is the pain on particular body part? See next. Particular internal organ? Yes. Did that person need to be taken to hospital? No. Was it life-threatening condition? No.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:46 am

Relevant organ: heart? lungs? stomach? liver? veins? brain?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:12 pm

Relevant organ: heart? lungs? stomach? This, no to the others. liver? veins? brain?

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:26 pm

Is specific cause of stomach pain relevant? Did the buyer eat too much chips? Did the employee relevantly help the buyer?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:32 pm

Is specific cause of stomach pain relevant? As in medical condition/cause-and-effect? No. Did the buyer eat too much chips? Enough to cause the relevant pain. Did the employee relevantly help the buyer? No, but...

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:38 pm

Did the employee call relevant help to the buyer? Did the buyer eat or drink something else to remedy the pain?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:40 pm

Did the employee call relevant help to the buyer? No. Did the buyer eat or drink something else to remedy the pain? Yes.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:45 pm

Did the buyer buy the relevant food/drink in the helped store? Did the buyer get the relevant food/drink for free? Relevant?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:55 pm

Did the buyer buy the relevant food/drink in the helped store? No. Did the buyer get the relevant food/drink for free? No. Relevant? No, OTWT.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:38 pm

Is it relevant how much later, after having bought and eaten chips, the buyer felt ill? Were they already at home?

by **danobrazil** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:53 pm

Do we have all the relevant characters? If so can you give them names, brief descriptions (relation, store they work for etc? Can we give the stores names? Possible recap?

Did the person who ate the chips have - acid reflux/heartburn? Or GI track gases?

Did onlookers see the person eating the chips when he was feeling sick and say to themselves "I'm not gonna eat those chips"? And as a result "I'm not gonna shop at that store"?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 2:20 pm

RedWine:
Is it relevant how much later, after having bought and eaten chips, the buyer felt ill? Yes. Were they already at home? Yes.

Danobrazil:
Do we have all the relevant characters? Yes. If so can you give them names, brief descriptions (relation, store they work for etc? Can we give the stores names? Possible recap? Sure.

Did the person who ate the chips have - acid reflux/heartburn? Exactly. Or GI track gases? No.

Did onlookers see the person eating the chips when he was feeling sick and say to themselves "I'm not gonna eat those chips"? No. And as a result "I'm not gonna shop at that store"? No.

Jake buys a bag of chips at Wally's. Jake shares them with his life partner Gina, who works for another store, Yodel. The chips give Jake heartburn a relevant time later, and he eats or drinks something (not really relevant what, or where it comes from) that remedies it. All this somehow helps Yodel.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 2:23 pm

Was Gina at home with Jack when he suffered from heartburn? Was she still at work? Did they relevantly talk to each other?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 2:28 pm

Was Gina at home with Jack when he suffered from heartburn? Yes. Was she still at work? No. Did they relevantly talk to each other? Yes.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 2:31 pm

Did Jake relevantly complain? Did Gina suggest a remedy? Did Jake make a relevant resolution?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 2:33 pm

Did Jake relevantly complain? No, but... Did Gina suggest a remedy? No. Did Jake make a relevant resolution? No.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 3:54 pm

Did Jake do anything else relevant besides taking the remedy? Did Gina say any reproaches to him?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:06 pm

Did Jake do anything else relevant besides taking the remedy? Yesish. Did Gina say any reproaches to him? No.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:18 pm

Did he go to bed? Did he call a doctor? Did he take a medication?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:24 pm

Did he go to bed? Yes, explore. Did he call a doctor? No. Did he take a medication? Yes.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:52 pm

Did he relevantly sleep? Was he relevantly unable to sleep? Did he take a stomach medication? A sleeping pill?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:53 pm

Did he relevantly sleep? Yes. Was he relevantly unable to sleep? Yes. Did he take a stomach medication? Yes, antacid. A sleeping pill? No.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:56 pm

Did he take the medication first, and only after he ate/drank something that finally remedied him? Did he sleep before taking medication? After?

by **danobrazil** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 5:52 pm

Does Gina or someone who works at Yodels start selling antacids? Or more of them?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:09 pm

Did he take the medication first, and only after he ate/drank something that finally remedied him? No, the medication is the thing he ate/drank, and it remedied him. Did he sleep before taking medication? Yes. After? No.

Does Gina or someone who works at Yodels start selling antacids? No/irr. Or more of them? No/irr.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:24 pm

So, Jake bought a pack of chips at Wally's, took it to Yodel, where his life partner, Gina, worked. They ate the chips together.
Was it after minutes? one hour? more than three hours? Gina and Jake came home? Did they come home together? Separately? Relevant?
Was it after minutes? one hour? more than three hours? Jake felt badly due to heartburn? Did he relevantly sleep before he felt badly?
Did Jake take the antacid after having slept? Was he relevantly unable to sleep after having taken antacid?
Was it after minutes? one hour? more than three hours? the antacid remedied Jake?
Did Jake and Gina relevantly talk while still in Yodel? While at home? Before Jake felt badly? Before Jake slept? Before Jake took the antacid? Before Jake could not sleep? Before Jake felt remedied?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:49 pm

So, Jake bought a pack of chips at Wally's, Yes. took it to Yodel, No. where his life partner, Gina, worked. She did. They ate the chips together. Yes.
Was it after minutes? one hour? more than three hours? FA. Gina and Jake came home? Did they come home together? Yes. Separately? Relevant? No.
Was it after minutes? one hour? more than three hours? This. Jake felt badly due to heartburn? Yes. Did he relevantly sleep before he felt badly? Yes.
Did Jake take the antacid after having slept? Yes. Was he relevantly unable to sleep after having taken antacid? Yes.
Was it after minutes? This. one hour? more than three hours? the antacid remedied Jake? Yes.
Did Jake and Gina relevantly talk while still in Yodel? FA. While at home? Irr. Before Jake felt badly? Irr. Before Jake slept? Irr. Before Jake took the antacid? No. Before Jake could not sleep? No. Before Jake felt remedied? No.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:54 pm

So Jake was never with chips at Yodel, correct? Did he take the pack already home? Did he buy the pack while he was going home with Gina from her workplace? Did Gina work late at night? Was Jake woken up by heartburn? Did Jake and Gina relevantly talked only after the medication helped Jake?

by **GalFisk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:57 pm

So Jake was never with chips at Yodel, correct? Correct. Did he take the pack already home? Yes. Did he buy the pack while he was going home with Gina from her workplace? Yes, a day before. Not that relevant. Did Gina work late at night? No. Was Jake woken up by heartburn? Yes. Did Jake and Gina relevantly talked only after the medication helped Jake? Yes.

by **RedWine** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 9:02 pm

Did Jake and Gina talk about how chips harmed Jake? About how the antacid remedied him? Did they invent a new way to advertise something? Did they invent a new way to promote Yodel? Did they work out the way to raise prices at Yodel?
Did Yodel benefit from: bigger sales? Bigger demand? Higher prices? More clientele? Wider assortment of products? Better quality of products? Relevant claims? Did Yodel sue someone and win?
Did Yodel only benefit because Wally relevantly lost?

by **danobrazil** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:59 pm

Was the benefit to Yodel - a one time thing? On going but for a very limited time? On going, perhaps even now?

by **GalFisk** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:30 am

RedWine:
Did Jake and Gina talk about how chips harmed Jake? Yes/irr. About how the antacid remedied him? Yes/irr. Did they invent a new way to advertise something? No. Did they invent a new way to promote Yodel? No. Did they work out the way to raise prices at Yodel? No.
Did Yodel benefit from: bigger sales? No. Bigger demand? No. Higher prices? No. More clientele? No. Wider assortment of products? No. Better quality of products? No. Relevant claims? No. Did Yodel sue someone and win? No.
Did Yodel only benefit because Wally relevantly lost? No/FA.

danobrazil
Was the benefit to Yodel - a one time thing? Yes. On going but for a very limited time? No. On going, perhaps even now? No.

by **RedWine** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:37 am

Did Jake earlier visit Gina at Yodel? Perhaps buying chips there? And now when chips harmed him so badly, he would not come to Yodel, therefore not distract Gina from work? Would Gina work better as a result of the situation?

by **GalFisk** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:00 am

Did Jake earlier visit Gina at Yodel? No. Perhaps buying chips there? No. And now when chips harmed him so badly, he would not come to Yodel, therefore not distract Gina from work? No, OTWT. Would Gina work better as a result of the situation? Yesish, OTRT.

by **RedWine** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:21 am

Did Gina eat chips at work? If so, did she pay for them? Will she refrain for eating them now?

by **GalFisk** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:38 am

Did Gina eat chips at work? If so, did she pay for them? Will she refrain for eating them now? No/irr to all.

by **RedWine** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:48 am

Would Gina relevantly inform Yodel's customers about something as a result of the situation? Would she relevantly come to work earlier? Stay longer? Get lower salary?

by **GalFisk** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:52 am

Would Gina relevantly inform Yodel's customers about something as a result of the situation? No. Would she relevantly come to work earlier? Yesish, explore. Stay longer? No. Get lower salary? No.

by **RedWine** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:55 am

Did she previously habitually come late? Did she come earlier only that one day? Did Gina also relevantly cannot sleep?

by **GalFisk** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:57 am

Did she previously habitually come late? No. Did she come earlier only that one day? Yope. Did Gina also relevantly cannot sleep? Yope - explore.

by **RedWine** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:14 am

Did Jake do anything relevant when he could not sleep? Did he also keep Gina awake?

by **GalFisk** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:26 am

Did Jake do anything relevant when he could not sleep? Yes... Did he also keep Gina awake? Noish, but close.

by **RedWine** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:37 am

Did Jake wake Gina up earlier than she would wake up by herself? If so, is it relevant why?

by **GalFisk** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:43 am

Did Jake wake Gina up earlier than she would wake up by herself? Yes, explore. If so, is it relevant why? No. She woke up when he went to take the medicine.

by **RedWine** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:55 am

Did Jake intend to wake Gina up? Did he need something from her? Was she happy about being woken up? Did they relevantly argue?
Did Jake eat chips in the evening, then go to sleep, wake up early because of heartburn and go to take the medicine, waking Gina up? Are there relevant steps missing?

by **GalFisk** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:58 am

Did Jake intend to wake Gina up? No. Did he need something from her? No. Was she happy about being woken up? Yesish, explore. Did they relevantly argue? No.
Did Jake eat chips in the evening, then go to sleep, wake up early because of heartburn and go to take the medicine, waking Gina up? Correct. Are there relevant steps missing? Not from this sequence of events, but after.

by **RedWine** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 11:01 am

Would Gina have overslept, had she not been woken up by Jake?

by **GalFisk** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 11:12 am

Would Gina have overslept, had she not been woken up by Jake?
Yes.
***SPOILER***
This happened to us last saturday.
I like potato chips, but they sometimes give me heartburn. Friday night we ate chips, saturday morning I woke up from heartburn, went to take an antacid. I incidentally woke up my partner, who discovered that she had forgotten to set the alarm for her monthly weekend shift. The vegetable helped her get to work in the store on time.

Which store we shop from each time is down to selection and convenience; we don't feel any particular loyalty to any of the big chains.