by gregoryuconn » Sun Apr 18, 2021 1:31 am
Is the nature of the relevant crime important? Yes If so, was it theft? Well, they stole something in a way, but there's a term which would be more accurate Murder or homicide? Murder is involved too, but there's a more specific term which would be better still. Fraud? Not specifically, but I believe the criminals committed this as well at some point. Assault? Probably could be considered this too, but again, there's a much more accurate term than any of those.
Was Lulu instantly lucky, as in something happened and she realized right then and there that she had been lucky? No, possible FA.
Or was it more of a drawn-out realization, as in Lulu and several others all buying one company's stock at the same time, Lulu sells her stock after a small gain and the others hold onto theirs hoping for greater gains but the stock suddenly tanks and Lulu is the only "lucky" one in the group? It would certainly have taken Lulu time to realize how lucky she was, but not in this way or for this reason.
When Lulu experiences the event or process that causes her to be considered lucky, is she among other people? Many other people experienced the same event at more or less the same time. But Lulu was (AFAIK) the only one to experience it and be lucky. Or is she alone? Could you clarify what you mean by "alone" please? Does anyone have to inform Lulu that she's lucky or does she realize it without being told? She would have been told some relevant information at some point but once given that, could likely figure out she was lucky without being told that specifically.