by JenBurdoo » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:34 pm
Could he have brought the carpet rolled up in a plastic bag in the attic? Yes. If not, because he would have lost in quality? Yes. Maybe dust relevant? No. Or maybe he did not have an attic? Relevant? No. Could he have prevented the pets from going to the carpet? No.
Relevant the carpet size? Did the carpet had relevantly cats figures on it? Maybe they could have attracted the pets... No to all.
Did he collect the carpet once the pets were no more at home? Yes. Because they died? Yes. relevant? Yes. Or maybe when something relevant not involving pets happened? No.
Did he own the cleaning business? Was the business in another country? Near his house? Near his place of work? Relevant how he came into possessing the carpet? Aladdin relevant (joking)? No to all.
Did the staff accept in exchange of something? Money? This.
Did he rent it to the cleaning service? No. Was it convenient for the cleaning business to keep the carpet? Irr. Did they clean it? Yes. If so, as soon as the owner brought to them? Yes.
Did they make something relevant with the carpet a part from cleaning it? Was the carpet old? Was it exposed? Did they give to the owner a copy? No to all.
Did they know when the owner would have come to collect it? They may have had a rough idea.
By the time he got the carpet back, did he no longer have pets at home? Correct. Think they wouldn't pose a danger to the carpet? No. Was he temporarily taking care of someone else's pets? No.
Is it relevant what kind of animal the pets were? Dogs? Could work. Cats? This. Birds? Reptilians? Relevant what kind of damage they might have done to the carpet? Yes. Would they simply have torn the fabric? No. Kept dirtying it? Yes.