by JenBurdoo1 » Tue Apr 18, 2023 1:58 am
Whoops, sorry Sarisbarie!
Was the murder of a human? Yes. Weapon: was food used in the murder? No. Club, knife, sword, poison, shock, drowning, falling, suffocation, strangling, gun, other weapon? Other weapon. Relevant? Only in that a weapon was involved.
Was there a long time between the murder and the moment when the victim was found? No. between the murder and the conviction of the murderer? No.
Natural decay of the victim relevant? No.
Was it immediately clear when the victim was found that he/she was murdered? Yes. or did people first assume natural cause of death? accident? suicide? None of these.
Was the victim H/A/M (when still alive)? Was the killer H/A/M? Assume yes to all.
Were the flies at some point near the victim? near the killer? near the weapon? This.
Did the flies show up whiie police was investigating this place? No.
Were the flies attracted by traces of blood on the weapon? Yes.
Spoiler:
Investigators determined that the victim had been killed by a sickle blade like those used by farmers. They ordered all farmers to present their sickles for inspection. Despite vigorous cleaning, flies detected traces of blood on the murderer's blade and congregated around it.